Objective: To evaluate the assistive care profile of hysterectomies, including the average length of hospital stay, average cost per procedure, and mortality rate among the five Brazilian regions. Methods: A total of 740,528 procedures were selected, encompassing the number of hospitalizations, average procedure cost, average length of stay, and mortality rate for total, subtotal, vaginal, puerperal, and videolaparoscopic hysterectomies performed in each unit of the Federation between January 2013 and December 2023. Results: Total hysterectomy was the most prevalent (78.30%), while puerperal hysterectomy was the least prevalent (0.80%). The Northeast region performed the most hysterectomies (42.6%), and the Central-West region performed the fewest (9.20%). Puerperal hysterectomy had the longest hospital stay (5.1 days), the highest mortality rate (567.15/10,000), and the highest average cost (R$1,504.00). Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy was of low prevalence, despite being the least invasive, having the lowest mortality rate (2.91/10,000), and the shortest length of stay (2.30 days). It was the second procedure with the lowest average cost (R$624.00), preceded by vaginal hysterectomy (R$597.00). Conclusion: The region with the highest number of procedures was the Northeast, with total hysterectomy being the most prevalent type across Brazil. Puerperal hysterectomy presented the longest average length of stay, the highest average cost, and the highest mortality rate, and was most prevalent in the Southeast region. Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy had the shortest average length of stay and the lowest mortality rate.
| Published in | Advances in Surgical Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-9 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hysterectomy, Epidemiology, Unified Health System, Hysterectomy, Public Health, Regional Disparities, Morbidity and Mortality
PROCEDURE | NUMBER OF PROCEDURES | % |
|---|---|---|
Total | 579.733 | 78,3 |
Vaginal | 83.465 | 11,3 |
Subtotal | 64.512 | 8,7 |
Videolaparoscopic | 6.876 | 0,9 |
Puerperal | 5.942 | 0,8 |
Total | 740.528 | 100 |
PROCEDURE BY REGION | NUMBER OF PROCEDURE | % |
|---|---|---|
Northeast | 315,240 | 42,6 |
Southeast | 207.792 | 28,1 |
South | 79.681 | 10,8 |
North | 69.927 | 9,4 |
Central-West | 67.888 | 9,2 |
Total | 740.528 | 100 |
HYSTERECTOMY | NORTHEAST | NORTH | SOUTH | SOUTHEAST | CENTRAL-WEST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,4; |
Subtotal | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 3,0 |
Puerperal | 5,1 | 5,1 | 4,2 | 5,3 | 5,9 |
Vaginal | 2,7 | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 2,3 |
Videolaparoscopic | 1,9 | 3,1 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 |
Avarage of all Prodedures | 2,4 | 3,1 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,5 |
HYSTERECTOMY | NORTHEAST | NORTH | SOUTH | SOUTHEAST | CENTRAL-WEST | MORTALITY RATE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 5.04 | 5,59 | 11,44 | 11,93 | 7,97 | 7,52 |
Subtotal | 70.69 | 21,1 | 17,24 | 19,95 | 39,3 | 27,44 |
Puerperal | 676,81 | 371,75 | 508,62 | 537,21 | 699,77 | 567,15 |
Vaginal | 7,4 | 6,3 | 5,8 | 4,63 | 1,05 | 5,27 |
Videolaparoscopic | 0 | 0 | 6,45 | 2,91 | 0 | 2,91 |
Mortality Rate | 8,01 | 9,74 | 18,2 | 19,15 | 13,26 |
LOS | Length of Stay |
| [1] | Murta EFC, Reis JD, Abrão JM, Miziara JM. Histerectomias: estudo retrospectivo de 554 casos [Hysterectomies: a retrospective study of 554 cases.]. Rev Col Bras Cir 2000 Sep; 27(5): 307–11. |
| [2] | Gopalani SV, Dasari SR, Adam EE, Thompson TD, White MC, Saraiya M. Variation in hysterectomy prevalence and trends among U. S. States and Territories-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012-2020. Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Oct; 34(10): 829-835. |
| [3] | Secretaria de Comunicação Social, Governo Brasileiro. Quantos brasileiros vivem no exterior. Brasília. [Secretariat of Social Communication, Brazilian Government. How many Brazilians live abroad. Brasília,] Published on April 10, 2024 at 12:52 PM. Accessed on March 12, 2025. Available at: |
| [4] |
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988 [BRAZIL. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988]. Accessed on 12/03/2025 Available at
https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm |
| [5] | Stopa SR, Malta DC, Monteiro CN, Szwarcwald CL, Goldbaum M, Cesar CLG. Use of and access to health services in Brazil, 2013 National Health Survey. Rev Saúde Pública. 2017; 51: 3s. |
| [6] |
Ministério da Saúde. Informações de Saúde [Ministry of Health. Health Information] Accessed on 12/03/2025. Available at:
http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sih/cnv/spauf.def |
| [7] | Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Estatísticas de Gênero - Indicadores sociais das mulheres no Brasil [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Gender Statistics - Social Indicators of Women in Brazil] Accessed on 12/03/2025. Available at: |
| [8] | Observatório Hospitalar. Painel Hospitalar da Saúde Suplementar – Brasil. [Hospital Observatory. Hospital Panel of Supplementary Health – Brazil]. Accessed on 12/03/2025. Available at: |
| [9] | Ferhi M, Marwen N, Abdeljabbar A, Mannai J. Psychological Outcomes and Quality of Life After Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study. Cureus. 2024 May 22; 16(5). |
| [10] | Kibbe MR. Surgery and COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Sep 22; 324(12): 1151-1152. |
| [11] | Martins TR, Witkin SS, Mendes-Corrêa MC, Godoy AS, Cury L, Balancin ML, Ab'Saber AM, Peres SV, Messias S, Tozetto Mendoza TR, Longatto-Filho A. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cervical Cancer Screening in São Paulo State, Brazil. Acta Cytol. 2023; 67(4): 388-394. |
| [12] | Silva, Z. P, Ribeiro, M. C. S. A, Barata, R. B., & Almeida, M. F. Perfil sociodemográfico e padrão de utilização dos serviços de saúde do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), 2003- 2008 [Sociodemographic profile and pattern of use of health services in the Unified Health System (SUS), 2003-2008]. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2011 16(9), 3807–3816 |
| [13] | Ministério da Saúde Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar. Setor fecha 2023 com 51 milhões de beneficiários em planos de assistência médica [Ministry of Health National Agency for Supplementary Health. Sector closes 2023 with 51 million beneficiaries in health care plans]. Accessed on 12/03/2025. Available at: |
| [14] | Thompson JD, Birch HW. Indications of hysterectomy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Dec; 24(4): 1245-58. |
| [15] | Oliveira GA, Lima JCO, Sobrinho AG et al. Oliveira. Mioma uterino no Brasil: Panorama epidemiológico e desafios para a saúde da mulher [Epidemiological overview and challenges for women's health]. Brazilian Journal of Implantology and Health Sciences, 2024 6(5), 2462–2471. |
| [16] | Boclin K de LS, Faerstein E. Prevalência de diagnóstico médico auto-relatado de miomas uterinos em população brasileira: Padrões demográficos e socioeconômicos no Estudo Pró-Saúde. [Prevalence of self-reported medical diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the Brazilian population: Demographic and socioeconomic patterns in the Pró-Saúde Study]. Rev bras epidemiol 2013 Jun; 16(2): 301–13. |
| [17] | FEBRASGO – Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Histerectomia laparoscópica: padronizar para proliferar. 2017 [FEBRASGO – Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: standardize to proliferate. 2017]. Accessed on 12/03/2025. Available at: |
| [18] | Faria, P. M., Silva, M. C. L., Ahnert, T. R., & Reis, B. C. C. Comparação epidemiológica da histerectomia vaginal e videolaparoscópica no Brasil de 2016 a 2021 [Epidemiological comparison of vaginal and video-laparoscopic hysterectomy in Brazil from 2016 to 2021]. Revista Ibero-Americana De Humanidades, Ciências E Educação, 2023 9(5), 3080–3089. |
| [19] | Castaneda S, Karrison T, Cibils LA. Peripartum hysterectomy. J Perinat Med. 2000; 28(6): 472-81. |
| [20] | Betti T, Gouveia HG, Gasparin VA, Vieira LB, Strada JKR, Fagherazzi J. Prevalence of risk factors for primary postpartum hemorrhage in a university hospital. Rev Bras Enferm. 2023; 76(5): e20220134. |
| [21] | van den Akker T, Brobbel C, Dekkers OM, Bloemenkamp KWM. Prevalence, Indications, Risk Indicators, and Outcomes of Emergency Peripartum Hysterectomy Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec; 128(6): 1281-1294. |
| [22] | Tsugawa Y, Jena A B, Orav E J, Blumenthal D M, Tsai T C, Mehtsun W T et al. Age and sex of surgeons and mortality of older surgical patients: observational study BMJ 2018; 361: k1343. |
| [23] | van der Leeuw RM, Lombarts KM, Arah OA, Heineman MJ. A systematic review of the effects of residency training on patient outcomes. BMC Med. 2012 Jun 28; 10: 65. |
| [24] | Nunes JT, Cavalcanti A de M, Santos BA dos, Ramos MM da SP. Histerectomia periparto em hospital público no interior do nordeste brasileiro. [Peripartum hysterectomy in a public hospital in the interior of northeastern Brazil]. Rev. Fac. Ciênc. Méd. Sorocaba. 2023; 24(1/4): 177-81. |
| [25] |
Scheffer M. C.; Almeida C. J.; Cassenote A. J. F. Radar da Demografia Médica no Brasil. Informe Técnico N 1. Setembro/2023. 26 páginas. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, AMB [Medical Demographics Radar in Brazil. Technical Report No. 1. September/2023. 26 pages. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, AMB]. Accessed 12/03/2025. Available at:
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/
https://www.cremesp.org.br/pdfs/DemografiaMedicaBrasilVol2.pdf |
APA Style
Schmitt, L. P., Fernandes, D. S., Ribeiro, E. P., Ferreira, M. C. (2026). Epidemiological Profile of Hysterectomies Within the Public Health System Across Different Regions of Brazil Between 2013 and 2023. Advances in Surgical Sciences, 14(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11
ACS Style
Schmitt, L. P.; Fernandes, D. S.; Ribeiro, E. P.; Ferreira, M. C. Epidemiological Profile of Hysterectomies Within the Public Health System Across Different Regions of Brazil Between 2013 and 2023. Adv. Surg. Sci. 2026, 14(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11
@article{10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11,
author = {Lorraine Purcino Schmitt and Deborah Silva Fernandes and Evelyn Purcino Ribeiro and Marcio Castro Ferreira},
title = {Epidemiological Profile of Hysterectomies Within the Public Health System Across Different Regions of Brazil Between 2013 and 2023},
journal = {Advances in Surgical Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1-9},
doi = {10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ass.20261401.11},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the assistive care profile of hysterectomies, including the average length of hospital stay, average cost per procedure, and mortality rate among the five Brazilian regions. Methods: A total of 740,528 procedures were selected, encompassing the number of hospitalizations, average procedure cost, average length of stay, and mortality rate for total, subtotal, vaginal, puerperal, and videolaparoscopic hysterectomies performed in each unit of the Federation between January 2013 and December 2023. Results: Total hysterectomy was the most prevalent (78.30%), while puerperal hysterectomy was the least prevalent (0.80%). The Northeast region performed the most hysterectomies (42.6%), and the Central-West region performed the fewest (9.20%). Puerperal hysterectomy had the longest hospital stay (5.1 days), the highest mortality rate (567.15/10,000), and the highest average cost (R$1,504.00). Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy was of low prevalence, despite being the least invasive, having the lowest mortality rate (2.91/10,000), and the shortest length of stay (2.30 days). It was the second procedure with the lowest average cost (R$624.00), preceded by vaginal hysterectomy (R$597.00). Conclusion: The region with the highest number of procedures was the Northeast, with total hysterectomy being the most prevalent type across Brazil. Puerperal hysterectomy presented the longest average length of stay, the highest average cost, and the highest mortality rate, and was most prevalent in the Southeast region. Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy had the shortest average length of stay and the lowest mortality rate.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Epidemiological Profile of Hysterectomies Within the Public Health System Across Different Regions of Brazil Between 2013 and 2023 AU - Lorraine Purcino Schmitt AU - Deborah Silva Fernandes AU - Evelyn Purcino Ribeiro AU - Marcio Castro Ferreira Y1 - 2026/01/19 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11 T2 - Advances in Surgical Sciences JF - Advances in Surgical Sciences JO - Advances in Surgical Sciences SP - 1 EP - 9 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-6182 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ass.20261401.11 AB - Objective: To evaluate the assistive care profile of hysterectomies, including the average length of hospital stay, average cost per procedure, and mortality rate among the five Brazilian regions. Methods: A total of 740,528 procedures were selected, encompassing the number of hospitalizations, average procedure cost, average length of stay, and mortality rate for total, subtotal, vaginal, puerperal, and videolaparoscopic hysterectomies performed in each unit of the Federation between January 2013 and December 2023. Results: Total hysterectomy was the most prevalent (78.30%), while puerperal hysterectomy was the least prevalent (0.80%). The Northeast region performed the most hysterectomies (42.6%), and the Central-West region performed the fewest (9.20%). Puerperal hysterectomy had the longest hospital stay (5.1 days), the highest mortality rate (567.15/10,000), and the highest average cost (R$1,504.00). Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy was of low prevalence, despite being the least invasive, having the lowest mortality rate (2.91/10,000), and the shortest length of stay (2.30 days). It was the second procedure with the lowest average cost (R$624.00), preceded by vaginal hysterectomy (R$597.00). Conclusion: The region with the highest number of procedures was the Northeast, with total hysterectomy being the most prevalent type across Brazil. Puerperal hysterectomy presented the longest average length of stay, the highest average cost, and the highest mortality rate, and was most prevalent in the Southeast region. Videolaparoscopic hysterectomy had the shortest average length of stay and the lowest mortality rate. VL - 14 IS - 1 ER -